Cover Story: Chinese Brokerages’ Dual Roles in Bond Market Sparks Concern for Conflicts of Interest That Raises Systemic Risk
Listen to the full version
China’s securities brokerages are thriving in the bond market, but a surge in the fixed-income sector has sparked concerns over regulatory loopholes and conflicts of interest.
In recent years, China’s securities brokerages have increasingly turned to fixed-income businesses as a cornerstone of their operations. Bonds now dominate the portfolios of Chinese securities brokerages, accounting for 65% to 70% of their holdings, according to Zhao Ran, chief analyst of non-bank finance at Citic Construction and Investment Securities. As of January, brokerages held about 4.5 trillion yuan ($632.2 billion) in bonds.
Download our app to receive breaking news alerts and read the news on the go.
Get our weekly free Must-Read newsletter.
- DIGEST HUB
- China’s securities brokerages have heavily invested in bonds, holding approximately 4.5 trillion yuan ($632.2 billion) and making fixed-income operations a key revenue source.
- Regulatory concerns have emerged due to potential conflicts of interest, opaque operations, and aggressive strategies, which risk market instability and significant losses for small and medium-sized banks.
- Increased regulatory oversight, including disciplinary actions and a big data monitoring system, aims to address illegal practices, market manipulation, and ensure stronger regulatory frameworks for bond market activities.
China’s securities brokerages are thriving in the bond market, but a surge in the fixed-income sector has sparked concerns over regulatory loopholes and conflicts of interest [para. 1][para. 5]. In recent years, the fixed-income market has become pivotal for Chinese brokerages, with bonds constituting 65% to 70% of their holdings. As of January 2023, brokerages held about 4.5 trillion yuan ($632.2 billion) in bonds [para. 2]. Leading brokerages like Citic Securities and Guotai Junan now manage bond advisory services worth hundreds of billions of yuan. Citic Securities, for instance, had a business scale of 450 billion yuan by the end of 2023 [para. 3].
These advisory services predominantly cater to small and medium-sized banks, which have increasingly outsourced their bond investments since around 2010 [para. 4]. However, despite their success, brokerages face criticism for potential conflicts of interest and opaque operations, especially in mixing asset management with investment activities [para. 5]. Comparisons are drawn to the post-2008 financial crisis measures in the U.S., where the Volcker Rule was introduced to restrict proprietary trading [para. 6]. Critics argue for similar regulations in China to close regulatory loopholes and prevent risky practices [para. 6].
The rapid growth in fixed-income operations has led to aggressive strategies that may expose small and medium-sized banks to significant risks. A sudden downturn in the bond market could result in substantial losses for these banks [para. 7]. In response, the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (NAFMII) has intensified oversight, issuing disciplinary actions against more than 40 institutions for violations in bond holding and trading. Investigations uncovered illegal practices like account lending and benefit transmission among small and medium-sized financial institutions [para. 8]. NAFMII has also launched self-discipline investigations into six financial institutions over issues related to illegal holding and lending of bond accounts [para. 10].
China’s brokerages have traditionally focused on managing their own funds and selling bonds, functioning as major underwriters and market makers [para. 12]. To expand their influence in the bond market, brokerages have targeted small and medium-sized banks as clients, implementing off-balance-sheet institutions to manage transactions and capital more flexibly [para. 13]. Over the past decade, major brokerages have expanded their roles to dominate the bond market. However, their increasing reliance on proprietary investments, which by 2023 accounted for almost 30% of brokerage revenue, has blurred lines between proprietary and asset management activities [para. 16].
The market sees the increasing dependence on proprietary investment as problematic. For instance, Haitong International Securities Group in Hong Kong suffered heavy losses after investing in U.S. dollar bonds issued by Chinese real estate companies, highlighting the dangers of excessive reliance on proprietary investment [para. 17]. Regulators have started scrutinizing brokerage practices more rigorously, with the Beijing Securities Regulatory Administration ordering CICC to increase compliance checks in response to conflicts of interest [para. 20].
The bond advisory business model typically involves three approaches: brokerages providing advisory services to banks, outsourcing asset management, or selling trust products through banks [para. 21]. The opacity of off-balance-sheet operations poses significant risks, as brokerages can shift losses or risks to other financial institutions, potentially destabilizing the market [para. 22]. The rapid growth of these services has made fixed-income departments quasi-asset management operations, yet without the same regulatory oversight [para. 23].
Illegal practices, such as account lending and price manipulation, have been unveiled, with institutions leveraging complex chains to obscure transactions, creating obstacles for regulatory oversight [para. 27][para. 28]. For instance, four rural commercial banks in Jiangsu province were found manipulating market prices [para. 32]. Experts call for stronger regulations and clearer distinctions between proprietary and client funds to prevent conflicts of interest [para. 34]. To ensure market integrity, brokerages are urged to follow robust internal controls and maintain clear operational boundaries [para. 37]. The consensus is that brokerages should return to their core role as capital intermediaries [para. 39].
- Citic Construction and Investment Securities
- Citic Construction and Investment Securities is a Chinese securities firm where Zhao Ran serves as the chief analyst of non-bank finance. As of January, the firm managed a substantial portfolio, including fixed-income assets. They held about 4.5 trillion yuan ($632.2 billion) in bonds, with bonds comprising 65% to 70% of their holdings.
- Citic Securities
- Citic Securities has rapidly expanded its bond investment advisory services, managing a business scale of 450 billion yuan by the end of 2023. The firm primarily caters to small and medium-sized banks, especially those lacking expertise in debt securities. Amid regulatory scrutiny, Citic Securities has implemented a comprehensive advisory system to manage substantial bond positions and enhance their influence in the fixed-income market.
- Guotai Junan
- Guotai Junan is a leading brokerage in China that manages substantial bond advisory services, worth hundreds of billions of yuan. The firm, alongside others such as Citic Securities, has seen rapid growth in this sector, primarily serving small and medium-sized banks. Despite their success, these businesses face scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest and regulatory challenges.
- Shanghai Purang Financial Services Co. Ltd.
- Shanghai Purang Financial Services Co. Ltd. initially capitalized on the opportunity to cater to small and medium-sized banks for bond investments around 2010. However, as regulatory scrutiny intensified in 2018, larger brokerages began to dominate the market, overshadowing early entrants like Purang.
- Haitong International Securities Group Ltd.
- Haitong International Securities Group Ltd. in Hong Kong faced heavy losses after investing in U.S. dollar bonds issued by Chinese real estate companies. This led to nearly HK$14.7 billion ($1.89 billion) in losses over 2022 and 2023, culminating in the brokerage's delisting from the Hong Kong stock exchange, highlighting the risks of excessive reliance on proprietary investment in bonds.
- CICC
- In April, the Beijing Securities Regulatory Administration ordered CICC to increase compliance checks after finding conflicts of interest between its proprietary and investment accounts. This action reflects heightened regulatory scrutiny of brokerage practices to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure market integrity.
- Changshu Rural Commercial Bank
- Changshu Rural Commercial Bank is one of the small urban and rural commercial banks in Jiangsu province. Recent probes by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (NAFMII) found it engaged in market manipulation and benefit transfer in the secondary government bond market. It has been trading large volumes of bonds daily, far exceeding typical market activity, and accounted for 30% to 40% of daily trading volume.
- Suzhou Rural Commercial Bank
- Suzhou Rural Commercial Bank, a participant in China's bond market, was involved in manipulating market prices and transferring benefits in the secondary government bond market. Along with other rural commercial banks in Jiangsu province, it engaged in aggressive bond trading strategies, making it one of the most active institutions in the secondary bond market and accounting for 30% to 40% of daily trading volume.
- By the end of 2023:
- Citic Securities reached a business scale of 450 billion yuan in bond advisory services.
- As of January 2024:
- China’s securities brokerages held about 4.5 trillion yuan ($632.2 billion) in bonds.
- April 2024:
- The National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (NAFMII) launched a self-discipline investigation into six small and medium-sized financial institutions over suspicions of illegal holding and lending of bond accounts.
- April 2024:
- The Beijing Securities Regulatory Administration ordered CICC to increase compliance checks after finding conflicts of interest between its proprietary and investment accounts.
- PODCAST
- MOST POPULAR